Only verses with footnotes are listed.
To see in Context.
Copyright by G. Allen Walker. All rights reserved.
2:2,
<† συμβιβασθέντων † RP ♦ συμβιβασθέντες † Q ‡ 1 word vs 1 word, 0 matching. ‡ Word change: were vs. were ‡ §§@ †>
,
<† πάντα πλοῦτον † RP ♦ πᾶν πλοῦτος † N V WH ‡ 2 words vs 2 words, 0 matching. ‡ Grammar change: 'all riches' vs. 'all riches'. ‡ §§@ †>
<† πάντα πλοῦτον † RP ♦ πᾶν τὸ πλοῦτος † Treg ‡ 2 words vs 3 words, 0 matching. ‡ 'all..., riches' vs. 'all, the riches'. ‡ §§§ †>
,
<† θεοῦ καὶ πατρὸς καὶ τοῦ † RP ♦ θεοῦ † Q ‡ 5 words vs 1 word, 1 matching. ‡ 'of God, and of father, and of the' vs. 'of God'. ‡ §§@ †>
,
2:4
(<=) but / now / and
<† δὲ λέγω ἵνα μή τις † RP ♦ λέγω ἵνα μηδεὶς † Q ‡ 5 words vs 3 words, 2 matching. ‡ 'but I am saying, in order that not anyone' vs. 'I am saying, in order that no one'. ‡ §§@ †>
,.
2:7,
IN / among / on / at
<† ἐν τῇ † RP ♦ τῇ † Q ‡ 2 words vs 1 word, 1 matching. ‡ Omitted word(s): 'in, the' vs. 'the'. ‡ §§§ †>
,,
<† περισσεύοντες ἐν αὐτῇ † RP ♦ περισσεύοντες † N Treg V ‡ 3 words vs 1 word, 1 matching. ‡ Omitted word(s): 'abounding in it' vs. 'abounding'. ‡ §§@ †>
.
2:13,
<† ὄντας ἐν † RP ♦ ὄντας [ἐν] † N ‡ 2 words vs 2 words, 2 matching. ‡ 'dead being in' vs. 'dead being [in]'. ‡ §§@ †>
<† ὄντας ἐν † RP ♦ ὄντας † Treg WH ‡ 2 words vs 1 word, 1 matching. ‡ Omitted word(s): 'being, ..., in' vs. 'being'. ‡ §§§ †>
,
<† συνεζῳοποίησεν ὑμᾶς † RP ♦ συνεζῳοποίησεν † TR6 ‡ Add 'you°'. 'he made* you° alive' vs. 'he made alive'. ‡ §§§ †>
,,
2:16
<† ἢ ἐν πόσει † RP Treg V ♦ καὶ ἐν πόσει † N WH ‡ 3 words vs 3 words, 2 matching. ‡ Word change: 'or in drink' vs. 'and in drink'. ‡ §§@ †>
,
<† νουμηνίας † RP ♦ νεομηνίας † N ‡ 1 word vs 1 word, 0 matching. ‡ Word change: of new month vs. new moons ‡ §§@ †>
:
2:17,
<† σῶμα χριστοῦ † RP ♦ σῶμα τοῦ χριστοῦ † Q ‡ 2 words vs 3 words, 2 matching. ‡ 'body Christ' vs. 'body the Christ'. ‡ §§@ †>
.
2:18,
no / not / lest
<† μὴ ἑώρακεν † RP ♦ ἑόρακεν † Q ‡ 2 words vs 1 word, 0 matching. ‡ Omit 'not': 'has not seen' vs. 'has seen'. {IMPORTANT: this omission reverses the verse's meaning -- MLV/RP condemn someone claiming visions of 'things he has NOT seen' (false claims); the minority reading drops the negation entirely, which would instead affirm he HAS seen these things. Real, meaningful difference on a doctrinally relevant point, not just grammar.} ‡ §§@ †>
,,